College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

PETA goes too far, too soon with orca tragedy

Guest Writer

Published: Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, March 3, 2010

By now you’ve all heard about the tragic death of a trainer at SeaWorld Orlando. I didn’t know Dawn Brancheau, but I knew of her. The field of marine mammal training is a small one, so it’s hard not to know about someone as talented and as passionate as she was.
I love animals. In fact, I love them enough to devote my life and my future career to working with them. And though I’m all for their humane treatment, there are some serious issues with the way People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has been handling tragedies like Brancheau’s death.
Whenever something as horrible as this happens, PETA is quick to put out a statement placing the blame on the person involved in an effort to advance their agenda. Not once in any statement or blog post has PETA expressed sympathy or condolences to Brancheau’s family and friends.
Having worked at both SeaWorld and the Navy Marine Mammal Program, I want to take this opportunity to clarify some of the misconceptions and accusations PETA makes on its website against those in my field. According to PETA sources, the organization has “long been asking SeaWorld to stop taking wild, ocean-going mammals from their families and ocean homes and confining them with no semblance of a life to an area that, to them, is the size of a bathtub.”
In fact, SeaWorld has not collected an animal from the wild since the 1970s. They have one of the most successful breeding programs in the world and often rescue animals from unfortunate situations and other facilities that are ill-equipped to care for such large animals. And while it’s true that Shamu Stadium is nowhere near the size of the Pacific Ocean, SeaWorld is monitored by approximately eight different animal welfare organizations to ensure that their animals are well cared for.
PETA also claims that SeaWorld animals “are forced to learn circus-style tricks” and, “according to whistleblower tips from trainers,” are isolated without food when they “refuse to perform common training methods.”
It should be obvious that no one can force a 12,000 pound killer whale to do anything. These animals are smart; they make their own decisions, and marine animal trainers simply ask them to perform behaviors as a form of enrichment. Many tricks are actually natural behaviors that have been shaped to suit a show. In my experience, never has an animal been denied food or put in isolation as punishment.
As for the “whistleblower tips,” that whistle is called a bridge, and it simply lets an animal know that they have performed a behavior correctly and have earned a reward. The tasks they perform are not mindless. Every dolphin and whale show is tailored to suit the performing animals’ particular strengths and interests.
You may remember Keiko, the killer whale made famous in the movie “Free Willy.” After much pestering on the part of animal activism groups like PETA, he was released back into the wild. The Associated Press reported last year that the whale “died in Norwegian coastal waters where he remained after millions of dollars and a decade of work failed to coax him back to the open sea.”
Keiko never lost his connection with people. After being released off the coast of Iceland, where he was captured in 1979, he swam to Norway and first turned up near the village of Halsa in late August or early September of 2002. He allowed fans to pet and play with him, even crawl on his back. In the end, he became such an attraction, that authorities had to impose a ban on approaching him. Until the day of his death, Keiko never left his caretakers to rejoin a wild pod, despite their $500,000 a month effort.
PETA claims that “it’s not just animals who are dying as a result of this industry,” but that “human injuries and deaths are also common.”
What happened in SeaWorld Orlando is the first recorded trainer death in SeaWorld’s entire 46-year history. Marine animal trainers are well aware of what they’re getting into. They know that they are entering the animal’s habitat and it’s an honor and a privilege to share it with them. In fact, a new Shamu trainer is not allowed to enter the water with a whale until approximately two years of “dry” work with that animal, building a relationship and establishing trust.
So the tragic accident that occurred on Feb. 24 was exactly that, an accident. The benefits and knowledge gained from working with these magnificent animals far outweigh the risks.
It is my personal belief that Brancheau would not want this to negatively affect the animals she so loved. I hope that one day PETA can respect the lives of those who make different life decisions, but still share the same passion for animals.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Anonymous
Mon Mar 8 2010 09:17
Well done article. We have similar issues in the livestock and horse training arena, with 1200 pounds of brain and muscle. We train horses and llamas to demonstrate emergency rescue procedures including laying down for simulated rescues and being picked up with a crane. But I am in awe of people who can successfully work with a 12,000 pound orca...
Thank you for sharing your opinion and pointing out some of the challenges. And bless this trainer's family and extended family who are dealing with the tragic loss of an amazing person.
Dr. Rebecca Gimenez
Linda T
Sat Mar 6 2010 21:34
Whales are just big delicious fish. PETA= people eating tasty animals

Really, when we kill off the whales, it will be a world without whales. So what.

When we get rid of men and fathers we can expect this:
- 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.

- 90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.

- 85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)

- 80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes --14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)

- 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)

- 75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes – 10 times the average. (Rainbows for All God’s Children)

- 70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)

- 85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)

Jakey Turley
Sat Mar 6 2010 21:16
Hey, this is Jake Turley

I didn't write that lame comment about being the king of usd, throw it up for democracy. (shocka for the 808)(Diamonds for Delt love)

I condemn both the whalers themselves and the activists who profit from fighting against them.
They are both whorish. France and Australia are backing support against whaling. I support them and will help push forward bills and policies that limit, restrict, and work on a effort to prevent harming whales.

They did not bomb Japan, contrary to popular belief.
Also, its not cool for PETA members to hook up with animals; that is so broken.

namaste to all,
Safe travels to all the beautiful USD students ftwing this wide brave world over SB12010

Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 19:15
"The article was blocked from posting on Friday afternoon, not evening."

Nice try. Semantics debate cannot win your argument. My comment was posted after 5PM. All of the comments disappeared much later in the evening.

Censorship of valid and logical comments to protect the "feelings" of a single group is wrong.

Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 18:22
The article was blocked from posting on Friday afternoon, not evening.
BobS
Sat Mar 6 2010 18:20
Continued:

As for the wage gap and glass ceiling myths, the following videos do a good job of explaining why men make more, as a whole than women, as a whole.

youtube.com/watch?v=WAzkQWgIEbU
youtube.com/watch?v=BpkXEfuuylY
youtube.com/watch?v=mqybaseue5Q
.youtube.com/watch?v=N2KBhvdvhtg
youtube.com/watch?v=pJwp6SKxthc

The short version is men generally don't leave the workforce for years to raise kids thereby losing out on wage increases and experience, men are more aggressive in pay negotiations, and men are more likely to excel as males are more widely distributed across the spectrum in terms of success AND failture (see below).

Women want equality and that's great. The problem is when feminists tell women they should all be equal to the top 10% of men thusly ignoring all the rest, including those at the bottom, and giving women false expectations. What ultimately happens is that women in the middle or on the bottom end of the spectrum think they're not getting "their fair share". Not so. In fact more men than women are on the bottom end of the spectrum than they are! The vast majority of the poor & homeless, victims of murder (and crime in general), workplace deaths, war deaths, etc are men. If you want your total equality then be prepared for some pretty negative consequences.

BobS
Sat Mar 6 2010 18:19
I tried posting this in the other article's comments, but it kept getting censored: Brett has many solid points. I strongly suggest those of you who don't have your facts straight to read the following books: The War Against Boys and Taken Into Custody. Both go into great detail exposing the sexism rampant in today's academic institutions and the family court system.

To be continued...

Brent Tuttle
Sat Mar 6 2010 18:16
I can assure you all this censorship is not the evil doings of The Vista staff; but rather the school's administration, perhaps the same who advocate "climate change" yet censor the invalidity of its' science. Regardless, do not project anger towards Ryan Mulvey or any other Vista Editor; without their help this article would have never made it to press. As soon as I find out which biased administration member has stuck his or her hands in the washed up affairs of USD student journalism, I will provide you the detailed contact information so that you may properly express your concerns. In the meantime, I appreciate everyone's support and hopefully all the comments will be reinstated so that I can properly respond and debunk every complaint one by one.
Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 17:25
I somehow doubt admin is around to do this (censor) in the late evening on a Friday.
Michael
Sat Mar 6 2010 16:15
People. I believe this is NOT the doing of The Vista, especially not Ryan Mulvey. The Vista wrote a feature article last year as a commentary on The Vista being Censored. So if I know anything about The Vista, I am sure they had nothing to do with disabling the comment section and were probably forced by the administration take action. Did anyone read the article Brent Tuttle wrote about ravers last semester? There were some pretty hateful comments used towards him. One said "I hope USD is disgraced to allow such a terrible reporter to write an article in my newspaper. Hell is reserved for people like you." IF The Vista wanted to censor comments they probably would have started there when personal attacks were being made. This sounds like the work of the administration. It's interesting that when Brent Tuttle is attacked, a white male, gets told to go to hell, the administration does nothing. However, once a feminist is told some facts, the world is flipped upside down and an open forum on the internet is shut down. Just something to think about.
not anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 14:32
Several MAJOR news outlets have picked up on this. It isn't the article that draws attention, but the censorship of the valid comments. Go ahead and shut them down. They have been saved forever.The following is proof that censorship DOES NOT WORK in the internet age:- The VistaStevenFri Mar 5 2010 14:38To some extent I understand the hostility towards Brent – but only because of so much feminist indoctrination in the world.Let’s address some advantages that women have (and can easily be Googled) that are often not known or are overlooked:1) Women make up almost 60% of all college graduates, and the situation for men and boys in education is barely discussed – let alone addressed. In the late 80’s and early 90’s organizations like the AAUW (American Association of University Women) began a campaign to get schools more oriented towards girls’ way of learning. They cited the same kind of feminist misinformation many of you have already read here (jobs, politicians etc) – but failed to tell the truth – which was that at the same time they were lobbying this, that girls had ALREADY caught up to boys in school. The results are what we see today – less men graduating H.S., going to college, or graduating from college. Someone on here asked “don’t you have a mom or a sister” – the same could be asked of you – don’t you care about your fathers, brothers or SONS?2) There are over 250 publicly funded Commissions “on the Status of Women” in the U.S. They are gov’t funded lobbyists within gov’t that advocate on women’s concerns. There is exactly **1** for men. It is unfunded (and therefore cannot hire staff and the people on it must volunteer after work) and must apply to even EXIST every 2 years.3) Since 1994, when VAWA (the Violence Against Women Act) was legislated, men have paid for services that promotes fear, anger, misinformation and judicial input that helps ONLY women, but not men. Men must pay, but are not allowed to be helped out. If a man is abused he cannot go to a local shelter, he will be turned away. If a parent flees an abusive spouse the law says it’s parental kidnapping, unless they go to a shelter. Nice catch 22.4) There is no wage gap. It’s that women choose to work different schedules, have more personal time, choose to take time off for childcare, and work in less risky jobs/organizations – they choose security over the higher paying risk. That’s neither good nor bad – it’s a CHOICE.5) Paternity Fraud: A woman can name any man she ever dated, or even someone she did not ever meet to be the father of her child. Often, knowing a DNA test will clear him, she’ll give a fake address. When they serve the notice or “diligently try to”, he defaults – and is adjudicated (legally named as) the father. He is now on the hook for 18 years of child support for a child he did not father. Getting that reversed in court is often impossible. He has been made into a wage slave, and even if the woman is caught, she will NOT go to jail “for the chlid’s sake”. In 2000 the ABB (American Blood Bank) published a study that said: Of the men seeking a DNA test (not the general population) ***29.7%*** were not the father. Yes, you read that right.6) Women only scholarships. 7) Women Owned Businesses (selected gov’t tax breaks).8) No feminists protesting outside Women’s Colleges (the Seven Sisters) for parity in admissions – while they DID protest outside VMI for the same reason. Equality huh?9) Not only having over 800 Womyn’s Studies programs – but also making their study mandatory in some colleges (I guess you can lead a horse to water ….) But when it comes to opening Men’s Studies (which I disagree with too), these sellers of “truth and equality” want none of it. Strange, no?10) More mothers kill their children than any other demographic. Look it up. The second on the list isnt’ fathers – it’s the mother’s boyfriends. Fathers are LAST on that list. 11) When a boy is molested by a woman and she gets pregnant, it is precedent law that says that he must pay his rapist child support. No, seriously – you can Google – there are many cases that made the papers.12) Touching a woman’s breast without her permission is sexual assault – kicking a man in his testicles is a punch line.13) More instances of rape occur each year in prison TO men, than women outside of prison (Google the #’s) – but feminists who “care so much about rape survivors” never seem to give air time, literature, or funding to stop it. So – is their agenda stopping the violence or is it to spread fear and propaganda to demonize men. Oh, and anyone who replies that women’s organizations are about women ….. where is the pamphlet, public service announcement, or campaign to end lesbian rape? It not only happens, but domestic violence is highest, of all groups, in lesbian relationships. Rape happens there too. It needs to stop, but since that does not fit their ideology of “the evil male”, they do squat. Smoke that idea over your barbeque and you’ll see it’s pretty...
BobS
Sat Mar 6 2010 11:06
Brian and Max have my support. The Opinion Editor, Ryan Mulvey, needs to be punished if not outright replaced. And my what a coincidence his information from the About Us/Meet the Staff page is not being published. Imagine that!

The blatant censorship stemming from that article is astounding. Where is the outcry from other staff and students?

Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 11:05
I go with PETA. Animals are NOT ours for entertainment! Please, FREE THE WHALES!
Jake Turley
Sat Mar 6 2010 04:10
i thought i should add something... I am the king of USD. there is noone elselike me. I am basically the coolest guy ever and you all should know...!!!
luiz braga from Rio de Janeiro,Brazil
Sat Mar 6 2010 01:10
i agree with the whales; man should be free as well as animals. Sorry for the tragic death of a trainer at SeaWorld Orlando. I am sure that she was doing her best, but i am sure that the whale had done her best too. It is an animal and sometimes things go out of control and we will never know why. So please, for the sake of all the other trainers, keep those huge animals free for once and for all. They don't belong to that sea aquarian. They were not born for that either. No matter what we do or try to they will always look around and find out that, that cage is not their home, i mean the proper one.
Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 01:01
Why would anyone think that raising wild animals in slavery is more ethical than capturing them from their natural habitat and breaking their wild spirit by forcing them into submission? Whether captive born or wild caught, they all live unnatural, restricted, demeaning lives deprived of all that their wild cousins enjoy. Marine parks are watery prisons, and the love trainers may feel for their animal captives is tragically misplaced, IMO. These people should put their efforts into saving the wild habitats of sea mammals, not force them to do silly tricks for bored humans.
Max Springfield
Fri Mar 5 2010 22:05
The letter I sent is similar. I would urge everyone who believes censorship on a college campus, funded at least in part with federal money, should not be used to stifle dissent and spirited discussion. Those with the most to lose are the students. How could you believe anything you hear, from any authority on campus, after this spectacle? Shame on you for censoring the most commented article in my memory. If this stands, these people who allow it need to be replaced.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 21:36
So here is a copy of the letter I just sent to the Vista editor.

Dear Editor,

Please stop the censorship of the comments attached to the opinion piece regarding Women’s History month. Your announcement:

“The policy for the comments section of the Vista website is currently under review, in light of the University Policy found in the Student Code of Rights and Responsibilities, which requires students to acknowledge who they are when posting an opinion or statement in the Vista.”

implies that you are reconsidering the comments feature of your newspaper, in light of anonymous comments made by individuals, which you claim is a policy violation.

However, you are no doubt aware

1) that this is the only article that has been silenced; other articles still have their comments sections in place.

2) these other articles also have anonymously posted comments

Therefore, you are either being accidentally unfair in your application of the policy, or you are deliberately silencing unpopular political views under the guise of adherence to university policy.

Stop this censorship now.

Freedom of speech includes the expression of unpopular and dissenting views. Freedom of speech is particularly relevant in the case of dissenting political views, such as the ideas discussed in the comments section of this opinion article prior to your censorship.

The free exchange of ideas is central to the purpose of a university. Blocking the expression of unpopular views is wrong (as agents of the press, and of a public university, no less). Please reinstate the comments section, or at least apply your censorship fairly, to silence all the comments across the paper.

Thank you,

Brian Aizen

Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 20:50
It is even worse reaper. I guess if the females or mangina in charge doesn't agree with the statements made, then just cover it up. It says a "policy is being checked". There are anonymous comments here, too. Pathetic. With an attitude like that, a degree from this place probably isn't worth the paper that it's printed on. Freedom of speech, logical debate? Hardly. Those in the wrong are generally the ones to block any dissenting opinion.
Sirreaper
Fri Mar 5 2010 20:07
Wow what happened to the article that was about women's history comment section? Why was it disabled? I remember posting something on a dating website pertaining to something like this and was written by a female doctorate of psychology! It was taken down in less than 24 hours by one commenter who thought it was "gender offensive"....OK Nazi-ism at a free dating site...sure whatever...isint this a university? I thought these things were meant to be debated...not stifled? Are the women of this campus and the web really needing tobe protected so much that they cant take a hard look at this, after all aren't we equal? I will monitor this one closely...

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In